Brass Tank

Having problems with a Seagull? - ask an expert here

Moderators: John@sos, charlesp, Charles uk, RickUK, Petergalileo

Post Reply
Gannet
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:47 pm
Location: Cirencester

Brass Tank

Post by Gannet »

Some advice please.

I have a brass tank which appears different in shape to the 40 series ones that I am familiar with. I would like to know what it came off and its date.
Dimensions are:- Fore and aft 4.5". Compared to 5" on others.
Height 3.1" Compared to 3.4"
Length 10.45" compared to 9.8"
End plates corner rad 7/8" Compared to 3/8" or 7/16"
These differences are not huge, but I thought larger than general variation.
The end plates are flat and without the SEAGULL stamping.
Different shape tank.JPG
Is it an early 40 series or is it from a larger Seagull?

Thanks.

Jeremy
User avatar
charlesp
Posts: 2567
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:37 pm
Location: Poole, Dorset, England

Re: Brass Tank

Post by charlesp »

It is indeed an early Forty series tank - specifically one of the earlier LS or LM motors. These were the first of the Forties that did away with the curved lugs of the FV/FVP style cylinder head.

It would have had the white bird decal, the small one not the big ornate Marston style one.
User avatar
Oyster 49
Posts: 3311
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:55 pm
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Re: Brass Tank

Post by Oyster 49 »

It would have had the white bird decal, the small one not the big ornate Marston style one.
These decals are available via SOS.
Gannet
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:47 pm
Location: Cirencester

Re: Brass Tank

Post by Gannet »

Thank you Charles for the info that it came from an LM or LS. I wouldn't mind the rest of the outboard - preferably the LM version - but that is a real long shot. More sensibly it should be reunited with an LM or LS which is tank less. Any takers?
I presume Charles, that your very early SJM hasn't got this tank version?

Oyster, I don't plan to put the decal on, except of course if I had the remainder of the LM......

Thanks
Jeremy
User avatar
charlesp
Posts: 2567
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:37 pm
Location: Poole, Dorset, England

Re: Brass Tank

Post by charlesp »

No Jeremy, I think by the time they had got around to the 'proper' Forties they had moved to the more familiar shape. I have no idea at all why they changed.
Gannet
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:47 pm
Location: Cirencester

Re: Brass Tank

Post by Gannet »

Oyster's thread about canted tanks got me thinking. (to nearly quote!).

In actual fact it got me examining my (FV) canted tank. It is the same carcass as my LM/LS tank as identified by Charles. I should have realised that before. Of course all the fittings are in a different position, but dimensionally the carcass is the same.

This I would have thought is no great surprise. The canted tank was in production; along came the LM/LS, and so they used the same shape tank. Have I got the chronological details correct, Charles?

Jeremy
User avatar
charlesp
Posts: 2567
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:37 pm
Location: Poole, Dorset, England

Re: Brass Tank

Post by charlesp »

Spot on, Jeremy
Post Reply